The Downfall of the Debt Settlement Business: The regulators are to vote on new restrictions.
The entire sector shouldn’t be torn apart for the unscrupulous actions by only a small amount of agencies. The FTC has recently put forth new limitations regarding the debt settlement industry that will prove to be critical in the downfall of the sector if put into legal action. A vote will take place in November this year with the goal of developing laws that will advantage US citizens looking for debt relief. But can it truly help people to pretty much eliminate the system of signing up with a business to negotiate bills on their behalf?

The principal trade associations representing debt relief services have put money into research studies to agree on the success and overall results of the debt settlement industry. Both TASC (The Association of settlement companies) and USOBA (United States Organization for Bankruptcy Alternatives) are trying to prove the true advantages of debt settlement to the government and to not allow the passing of such heartwrenching restrictions.

Debt settlement companies work on customers’ behalf to negotiate down unsecured bills, such as credit card debt, unsecured personal loans, lines of credit and doctor bills. They aide a branch of US residents with difficult hardships, like health illnesses, job loss, bad marriages, or the loss of a family member.

Most of the amendments that the Federal Trade Commission is looking to put forth—including a ban of advance charges— would pretty much eliminate this viable plan for consumers who are having difficulty with unsecured credit card debt. TASC layed out in a quick historical performance numbers the economic worth its member agencies extend to Americans who retain debt settlement programs, and it is neatly illustrated. So you can understand, based on a current data research of its members, TASC estimates its members settled more than 94,000 accounts totaling more than $553 million in debt in the first half of this year. This is a yearly projected sum of more than $1.1 billion in unsecred debt settled by TASC members for just 2009. Majority of other data compilations also clearly show the benefit of the debt settlement sector as a whole, proving the beneficial impact of the consumers in general.

USOBA has supported data compilations of the debt settlement industry by Dr. Richard A. Briesch, an Assistant Professor of Marketing at Southern Methodist University’s well known Cox School of Business, releasing the study with the name “Economic Factors and the Debt Management Industry” in the beginning of this month. He looked over an independent objective assessment of the benefit to Americans, if there is one, offered by debt settlement companies. In looking over specific areas of doubt in the debt settlement sector, like consumer graduation rate of debt settlement programs, up-front charges, the training of settlement officers, and general consumer benefit, Dr. Briesch came to the conclusion that debt negotiation can offer huge value and be positive for Americans even beyond what debt consolidation can provide.

Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch of the Federal Trade Commission also says that the Debt Settlement sector has an important role to play as he said “For example, a debt settlement service can negotiate on the customer’s behalf, especially in cases where consumers are scared , humiliated, or even afraid to contact their collectors directly. A debt settlement firm also would be able to provide individualized attention to consumers, taking a wholesome approach to all of the consumer’s credit card debt owed to various creditors, rather than just the amount owed to an individual creditor. Managing the complete debt portfolio and focusing on restoring the client’s economic health has always been a critical value proposition of debt management negotiators.” Rosch moves further to mention several recommendations to the industry that can aide in reducing the issues by consumers, since it’s the complaints that drive the Federal Trade Commission and other government bodies such as Attorney Generals’ offices, Legal Bar Associations, and the Better Business Bureau to criticize, report, and come down on the agencies working in the industry.

The The Federal Trade Commission dosen’t need to set restrictions in place to assist consumers because there are many sources to check when seeking out an honest company to aide you in debt freedom. Also, understand that a service that is a member of either TASC or USOBA would be a safe choice because these associations were started to shield consumers and to make sure that their member agencies are adhering to a higher standard.

Clearly, different agencies use differing programs and fee structures that will work for different consumers according to their specific needs, but when the correct research is conducted, the chance of going with a scammer organization is enormously reduced, if not completely eliminated. Debt settlement has shown to be a plan that assists consumers; it would be a disservice to consumers to possibly terminate the industry by enacting extremely strict regulations.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!